Boycott's Corner - Open Sesame..!!!
While talking at the end of 2nd day's play, Boycott had this to say about Dravid opening... "It might not be good for Dravid.. but it is good for Team India... and that's what finally counts.."
Boycott feels that Dravid is probably the best bet for India as an opener to stabilize the team composition. If India needs to play 5 bowlers they can't afford an extra specialist opener (read Gambhir/Jaffer) and the middle order is too crowded with Yuvi/Dada/Kaif. He feels that young athletic players like Yuvi and Kaif should both form an integral part of the Indian middle order and the opener's slot is too specialized to ask someone sub-standard (read Jaffer/Gambhir/Ganguly/Yuvi) to do it. Having a player there out of place would probably result in an early wicket which means Dravid more or less opens... If you have 4 great bowlers with variety, then you probably donot need 5 man bowling attack which India sadly needs especially on pitches like these. This means that the batting lineup needs to be prepared with a lot of thought and not with make-shift solutions. Couple of thoughts that floated were : Kaif to open or why not Sachin... probably as equipped as Dravid in the technique department. In the end, Manjrekar said the key word.. 'Can we send in Tendulkar and risk losing his wicket..' so, in the end.. all we want at opener's slot is a sacrifical wicket to take care of new ball.. so that we can protect the Tendulkars and Dravids) or am I reading this wrong..???



